Q : Dear AlWarraq, do you really think that morals and disgust are not originally material?
A: Yes, and I am sure. You have no evidence that they have a
material origin, have you? Since there is no evidence that points to their
material origin, then the doubt in their materiality is more valid than the
doubt in their immateriality, because they look nothing like matter. Also, they
are in opposition with the laws of matter and physics. So, on what basis can we
say that morality and feelings of disgust are material? Rather, on what basis
shall we doubt that they are not?
As to the fallacy of the material and utilitarian basis of
morality, it is a refuted one, because morals are morals and interests are
interests . But to who utilizes morality for a selfish intention
(self-interest), then this intention will identify the act. Thus, those
seemingly moral acts can't be called morals, they're, rather, interests. If you
have evidence proving the material basis of morals and disgust, please present
it to us.
Materialists deal with feelings (including morals) as if they were
material, in an entirely unscientific way, i.e. they depend on guessing. And
that is a type of atheistic metaphysics. They firmly believe in the physicality
of ideas and feelings without presenting any evidence, while they demand
evidence from others on everything!
Since feelings and thoughts are immaterial, therefore there is a
moral (immaterial) world that exists within us, a spiritual world which
motivate us .
The materialists denial of the soul is unscientific. Because they
did not prove the physicality of what is attributed to the soul. We are in the
age of knowledge, but they don't have any knowledge in this field. They want us
to believe in what they say because we should trust them, trusting the
scientific coats they wear and the flasks and tubes in front of them, i.e. the
predesigned stage.
People's minds have never steeped this low before, because science
now has become a puppet and a market for ideologies more than what happened
with religion and history. Before, they used to control people in the name of
religion. Now, the church of science has took the place of the church of
religion. However, people who rely on their own thinking and don't hand their
trust to anyone except their own minds, will not fall for this game, as they
hadn't fell for the previous one.
0 التعليقات: