Everything
in the mind has its basis in the feeling, humanity's mind is the result of
humanity's feeling. The human feeling is basically needs, and those needs are
either material or immaterial (moral). The animal doesn't have moral needs, and
its feeling is comprised of instincts related to its existence, preserving its
species, safety, food etc… . This is indicated by the fact that animals have no
principles or morals. Thus, when we talk about the nature of man we should bear
in mind the duality of this nature, for man has two natures: material and
moral.
Both
the sane and the insane person have the same needs, but they won't meet those
needs the same way due their different mental capabilities. The mind is the
tool of the feeling to deal with the external material world, and the material
world is the embodiment of the mind and from it the mind takes its vocabulary.
The is indicated by the material origin of the vocabulary of the language, and
language is the means to communicate the feeling and the mind.
Let's
assume that both those two persons were inside a burning room, both the
feelings of the sane and the insane want to escape, but chances for the sane to
survive are higher. Because they can go beyond the limits of the room with
their mind which makes them know the right way more than the weak-minded. Here
the mind is a servant of the feeling, and that's why God has praised people of
minds in the Quran, and the good mind is the one that accurately follows the
feeling and provides solutions that meet the feeling's needs and don’t oppose
other feelings. The feeling itself is a huge package of feelings and emotions
moving in isolated lines. So, there must be a mind to coordinate their symphony
and prevent them from contradicting one another, as does the maestro with tens
of music players.
Coordination
often occurs between moral feelings and material ones, as in the need for food
which the mind regulates using a higher need like fasting or wrongness of
stealing. If it wasn’t for this coordination, there will be chaos and conflicts
that harm the human and make them contradict themselves.
Thus,
the right mind is the one taken from nature -material and moral-, and not a
product of society, religion or circumstances like what materialists and
atheists claim, and under such notion they demand rebellion against all we took
from society. This is like an implied call to rebel against reason, and after
that they boast about their reasonability!
I'm
defending sound reason, not everything we took from our societies, but they
want us to revolt against everything! And at the same time they wants us to
obey and submit to all our animalistic instincts! No matter how weak they were,
and they demand that we neglect all what our virtuous instincts tell us, no
matter how strong they were. The result ,then, will be animalism, to add fuel
to the fire of the evolution theory which gives scientific cover to say that:
you are animals! So practice your animality otherwise you'll have psychological
illnesses as Dawkins and Freud repeatedly say, after they had denuded man from
the best thing in them: their higher instincts, and contended themselves with
the lower instincts.
Every
correct knowledge humanity gains is a mind added to the previously accumulated
mind, including scientific facts. When a science is proven to be a fact it
becomes logic (which part of the mind). Every proven knowledge becomes part of
reason and logic whether material or moral, without contradicting the
previously built knowledge which humanity made sure of through experience.
Thus, science is mind and mind is science, but the mind is more general while
science is specific.
For
example, man feels cold so they try to remember where they put their heavy
clothes, look for firewood or think of a new heating system etc… . All those
operations are mental operations preceded by the feeling of cold. So, the
feeling precedes the mind. Therefore the mind is a servant of the feeling.
People
feel annoyed by crowded cars for example, or car accidents, so the mind starts
working and making traffic laws, traffic signs, bridges etc…, in an attempt to
solve the problem that annoyed the feeling.
People
feel pain from illnesses, that is why the science of medicine emerged. People
feel tired of travel, that is why they invented the world of transportation and
communication, and so on and so forth.
Thus,
man is basically a follower of the feeling not the mind. Yes sometimes we
follow the mind before we feel, but that's due to the belief that this mind is
built of the basis of feeling. But when we discover its opposition to the
feeling we abandon it and look for another mental solution. This applies to
everything, from finding a suitable way to cook food to a whole ideology.
If
humanity were followers of the mind they wouldn’t have repeatedly abandon it
and change it, and there wouldn’t be so many people who oppose it. We find a
group of people trying to solve the problem of traffic jams or any other
problem, they agree on the basis which is there is a problem and it harmed
them, but they differ in the way to solve it.
One
proof of the notion that the feeling is what moves humanity is the constant
change of means through civilizations while having the same needs, like the
need for safety, comfort, survival etc…. The ancients were looking for means to
help them in their lives even though they didn’t know electricity or trains,
but they used their minds to solve their problems, and the need is still the
same. Therefore, the feeling is the motivator and it's always first, and
science has never stopped, which means that the mind has never stopped.
On
this basis, we have two types of learning: Strong learning and weak learning.
Strong learning is the one that comes directly from the feeling to mind, i.e.
starts from the need. The weak learning is what starts from the mind to the
feeling, on the assumption that this mind is built from the feeling. Modern
education is based on weak learning, which crams into the student's mind issues
and assumptions which they didn’t feel the need for and didn’t concern them,
where what concerns them is neglected. This forces students to blind
memorization which is rarely held by the feeling, because memory is connected to
the feeling.
Notice
yourself when you say: I wanna do something but I donno what it is and how do I
do it! This happens to us all the time. What started it is a feeling and then
came the mind and the memory. The mind works through the memory and who has no
mind has no memory. Intelligence is the speed, accuracy and capacity to load
information and to expose them to both memory and feelings.
Memory
is controlled by the feeling. notice that when a person forgets something,
they're sure they've forgotten something but don't know what it is, and then
they start thinking and remembering until they remember. So, the feeling
doesn’t forget, and everything that is connected to the feeling can't be
forgotten, for no one forgets the things they love even people with amnesia,
they didn't literally lose memory otherwise they will forget how to eat or how
to walk! All skills can't be forgotten, even playing the piano.
0 التعليقات: